Multiple Regression via Measurement

The Complete Story on One Page

|-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|    BLOOD TEST
0   1 :    2       :     3    :(4):5:6: 7: 8  :   9   9   Urea Nitrogen
0    1   :   2   :  3  :  4 :(5) 6  :  7  : 8  : 9    9   Uric Acid
0    0    :        1     :   (2) : 3:45:67:8  : 9     9   Creatinine
 
0                   NO    :   (YES)                   1     GOUT?
|-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|
10   20    30    40    50    60    70    80    90   100  Measure
 
    1            1     3  5 65 87 31121 21 1        Patients with gout
 
                 1
       2  3   2  0   5 9  8 51 11 1                Patients without gout

Figure 1. Measure-based "multiple regression" of gout.

Kyle Perkins sent me physical dimensions, blood chemistries and diagnoses for 96 clinically-relevant patients, half of whom were thought to have gout. Since the precise relationship between the physical indicators and their medical implications is not known, I linearly transformed the original 3 physical and 5 chemical metrics into rating scales with ten categories, 0-9. The 5 diagnoses, reflecting expert (but imperfect) medical opinion, were coded as present=1, absent=0.

Rasch Multiple "Multiple Regression"

+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|  RAW                        |INFIT|OUTFIT|SCORE|               |
| SCORE  COUNT  MEASURE  ERROR|MNSQ |MNSQ  |CORR.|  ITEMS        |
|-----------------------------+-----+------+-----+---------------|
|   408     96    60.3A     .7| .83 | .82  |  .83| URIC ACID     |  INDEPENDENT
|   325     96    62.7A     .8| .70 | .75  |  .72| UREA NITROGEN |  VARIABLES
|   181     96    55.3A     .8| .89 |1.07  |  .62| CREATININE    |
------------------------------------------------------------------
|    48     96    53.7     1.9| .80 | .88  |  .61| GOUT          |  DEPENDENT
|    45     96    55.2     1.9| .91 |1.08  |  .51| HyperTense    |  VARIABLES
|    22     96    66.0     2.1|1.01 | .81  |  .39| Diuretic      |  Successful
------------------------------------------------------------------
|     6     96    79.5     3.5|1.19 |3.33  | -.03| KidneyStone   |  Unsuccessful
|     9     96    75.7     2.9|1.19 |4.78  | -.06| Diabetes      |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+

Table 1. Measure-based Rasch multiple "multiple regression"

Diagnoses "Regressed" on Blood Chemistry

------------------------------------------
|Opinion|  Count | Avg Meas | Diagnosis  |
------------------------------------------               DIAGNOSTIC
| absent|     48 |    47.70 | GOUT       |  DIAGNOSIS     MEASURES
|present|     48 |    59.44 |  1/0= +12  |   R= +.61        59
|----------------------------------------|
| absent|     51 |    48.93 | HYPERTENSE |  DIAGNOSIS               DEPENDENT
|present|     45 |    58.83 |  1/0= +10  |   R= +.51        59
|----------------------------------------|
| absent|     74 |    51.50 | DIURETIC   |  DIAGNOSIS               VARIABLES
|present|     22 |    60.52 |  1/0= +9   |   R= +.39        61
|-------+--------+----------+------------|
| absent|     90 |    53.65 | KidneyStone| No Diagnosis
|present|      6 |    52.42 |  1/0= -1   |   R= -.03
|----------------------------------------|
| absent|     87 |    53.76 | Diabetes   | No Diagnosis
|present|      9 |    51.77 |  1/0= -2   |   R= -.06
+----------------------------------------+

Table 2. Clinically-relevant diagnostic thresholds.

My next step was to discover which pieces of this heterogeneous collection would cooperate together to tell a meaningful story. From the necessarily rough ordinal data, I constructed Rasch measures.

Factor analysis of the residuals reported that blood creatinine, uric acid and urea nitrogen clustered with diagnoses of gout, hypertension and diuretic. Excluded were triglycerides, cholesterol, height, weight, surface area and the diagnoses of diabetes and kidney stones.

This led to the specification of a blood chemistry variable, based on levels of creatinine, uric acid and urea nitrogen, on which I could regress all five diagnoses. This was easily done by (1) calibrating these three items by themselves along with their rating scales; (2) anchoring these calibrations and the matching person measures, and (3) introducing gout and other diagnostic dichotomies into the analysis. [Later, Ben simplified (2) and (3) by using zero-item-weights for the non-measurement variables.]

The first results bear on the diagnosis of gout. Figure 1, "The Complete Story in One Picture", shows how well my new 3-blood-chemistry variable predicts a gout diagnosis. This Figure has the meaning of a conventional "multiple regression" in which gout is regressed on blood chemistry, but without the usual statistical obfuscation.

In Figure 1, there is the usual and unavoidable region of uncertainty, here between measures of 48 and 59. Otherwise the discrimination of gout/not gout is quite clear.

Investigation of the two "gout" patients with measures of 16 and 39 raise strong doubts about the accuracy of their recorded diagnoses. Neither has any blood chemistry evidence of gout.

Investigation of the two "no gout" patients with measures of 66 and 64 urge reconsideration of their diagnoses, since both have blood chemistries indicative of gout.

The measurement-based "regression" analysis laid out in Figure 1 was also done for the other four diagnoses. In fact, since the blood chemistry items, rating scales and person measures are all anchored, multiple "multiple regressions" can be done simultaneously.

These results are listed in Table 1, Rasch "Multiple Multiple Regression". The "multiple regression" correlations are simply the correlations between the scores on the diagnostic items and the patient measures. Gout=.61, Hypertension=.51, Diuretic=.39, Kidney Stone=-.03 and Diabetes=-.06 are clear enough. But much more accessible and useful are the diagnostic measure values and their explicit regions of uncertainty for the clinically-relevant patients summarized in Table 2.

Gout turns on at 59 with doubt down to 48.

Hypertension turns on at 59 with doubt down to 49.

Diuretic turns on at 61 with doubt down to 52.

Kidney Stones and Diabetes cannot be predicted from this blood chemistry variable.

Analyses like this could be run on all blood chemistry data for all diagnoses. Then relationships could be detected and variables constructed to implement all predictable diagnoses. The indicative levels for each diagnosis could be updated continually to focus on local and current practice and to keep pace with changing ways.

How simple, convenient, timely and useful!

Benjamin D. Wright with K. Perkins and K. Dorsey, Southern Illinois University

Multiple regression via measurement. Wright B.D. … Rasch Measurement Transactions, 2000, 14:1 p.729




Rasch Books and Publications
Invariant Measurement: Using Rasch Models in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, 2nd Edn. George Engelhard, Jr. & Jue Wang Applying the Rasch Model (Winsteps, Facets) 4th Ed., Bond, Yan, Heene Advances in Rasch Analyses in the Human Sciences (Winsteps, Facets) 1st Ed., Boone, Staver Advances in Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education, X. Liu & W. J. Boone Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences (Winsteps) Boone, Staver, Yale
Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (Facets), Thomas Eckes Statistical Analyses for Language Testers (Facets), Rita Green Invariant Measurement with Raters and Rating Scales: Rasch Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments (Facets), George Engelhard, Jr. & Stefanie Wind Aplicação do Modelo de Rasch (Português), de Bond, Trevor G., Fox, Christine M Appliquer le modèle de Rasch: Défis et pistes de solution (Winsteps) E. Dionne, S. Béland
Exploring Rating Scale Functioning for Survey Research (R, Facets), Stefanie Wind Rasch Measurement: Applications, Khine Winsteps Tutorials - free
Facets Tutorials - free
Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (Facets) - free, J.M. Linacre Fairness, Justice and Language Assessment (Winsteps, Facets), McNamara, Knoch, Fan
Other Rasch-Related Resources: Rasch Measurement YouTube Channel
Rasch Measurement Transactions & Rasch Measurement research papers - free An Introduction to the Rasch Model with Examples in R (eRm, etc.), Debelak, Strobl, Zeigenfuse Rasch Measurement Theory Analysis in R, Wind, Hua Applying the Rasch Model in Social Sciences Using R, Lamprianou El modelo métrico de Rasch: Fundamentación, implementación e interpretación de la medida en ciencias sociales (Spanish Edition), Manuel González-Montesinos M.
Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications, Fischer & Molenaar Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Georg Rasch Rasch Models for Measurement, David Andrich Constructing Measures, Mark Wilson Best Test Design - free, Wright & Stone
Rating Scale Analysis - free, Wright & Masters
Virtual Standard Setting: Setting Cut Scores, Charalambos Kollias Diseño de Mejores Pruebas - free, Spanish Best Test Design A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory, Andrich, Marais Rasch Models in Health, Christensen, Kreiner, Mesba Multivariate and Mixture Distribution Rasch Models, von Davier, Carstensen

To be emailed about new material on www.rasch.org
please enter your email address here:

I want to Subscribe: & click below
I want to Unsubscribe: & click below

Please set your SPAM filter to accept emails from Rasch.org

Rasch Measurement Transactions welcomes your comments:

Your email address (if you want us to reply):

If Rasch.org does not reply, please post your message on the Rasch Forum
 

ForumRasch Measurement Forum to discuss any Rasch-related topic

Go to Top of Page
Go to index of all Rasch Measurement Transactions
AERA members: Join the Rasch Measurement SIG and receive the printed version of RMT
Some back issues of RMT are available as bound volumes
Subscribe to Journal of Applied Measurement

Go to Institute for Objective Measurement Home Page. The Rasch Measurement SIG (AERA) thanks the Institute for Objective Measurement for inviting the publication of Rasch Measurement Transactions on the Institute's website, www.rasch.org.

Coming Rasch-related Events
Apr. 21 - 22, 2025, Mon.-Tue. International Objective Measurement Workshop (IOMW) - Boulder, CO, www.iomw.net
Jan. 17 - Feb. 21, 2025, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com
Feb. - June, 2025 On-line course: Introduction to Classical Test and Rasch Measurement Theories (D. Andrich, I. Marais, RUMM2030), University of Western Australia
Feb. - June, 2025 On-line course: Advanced Course in Rasch Measurement Theory (D. Andrich, I. Marais, RUMM2030), University of Western Australia
May 16 - June 20, 2025, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com
June 20 - July 18, 2025, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Further Topics (E. Smith, Facets), www.statistics.com
Oct. 3 - Nov. 7, 2025, Fri.-Fri. On-line workshop: Rasch Measurement - Core Topics (E. Smith, Winsteps), www.statistics.com

 

The URL of this page is www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt141a.htm

Website: www.rasch.org/rmt/contents.htm